Liberal Bias Rules UNM Law School · 17 October 2006
Well, the UNM Law School is no patriarchy. The dean is a woman and fifty-seven
percent of this year's entering class is female. During orientation, new female
students were warned by members of the Feminist Legal Caucus to avoid the Federalist
Society or they would be "marked forever."
For the record, the Federalist Society is a highly respected national legal
organization with chapters on campuses throughout the country. It champions
conservative and libertarian ideas— as well as debate over them. But
the University of New Mexico Law School is not a place for free and open debate.
A 2004 study by the New Mexico Federation of College Republicans found that
100 percent of the full-time professors at the law school were registered Democrats.
The Federalists could not find a conservative to serve as their faculty adviser.
By contrast, the student body is politically diverse. Students complain that
courses lack objectivity. Here is the catalogue description for a seminar called
Environmental Global Warming: "Global climate change is the major environmental
threat of our era. Its effects are felt by all species, but especially on those
who are poor...." Another course called Gender and the Law explores "how
the Law created categories that support subordination based on gender."
All of the students in the Clinical Law Program recently had to attend a lengthy
lecture on immigration given by an ACLU member and watch a video of a weeping
woman facing deportation. For "balance" the students were shown a
30-second anti-immigration television commercial from an Alabama political
candidate.
The day I visited campus UNM faculty members were organizing a teach-in on
Guantanamo and manning tables to protest military recruiters on campus. Last
year the faculty achieved a prized, long-term goal: it terminated a hugely
popular "DA Law Clinic" where students worked with the local District
Attorney's Office. The professors were uncomfortable with a program that prosecuted— rather
than defended— accused criminals.
The dean of the law school, Suellyn Scarnecchia, professes a commitment to
diversity— but that does not include changing the school's strict "liberals
only" hiring policy. She and her faculty seem not to question the ethics
of running a public, taxpayer-supported law school as if it were a re-education
camp for the political left.
The dean recently did make an attempt to respond to student pleas for change.
She introduced a new course called "Difficult Dialogues." Her idea
was to provide a forum where students across the political spectrum could have
civil and rational discussions.
Students say the classes are "ridiculous" and include a lot of confronting,
screaming and accusing. In a recent session students "debated" whether
or not the law school should offer more evening and part-time courses. One
male student suggested that it might lower the school's already modest ranking.
An outraged female student burst into tears and accused him of not caring about
the needs of mothers with young children.
The dean's new course is not a solution to the law school's problems, but another
example of its chronic intolerance. It is true, of course, that most of the
nation's law schools have predominantly liberal faculties, but under responsible
leadership they do not stifle dissent.
After speaking at UNM I next lectured at the University of Colorado. Far from
being under siege, the Federalists say they are treated respectfully by most
faculty and students. With a few notable exceptions, the professors do not
pummel students with their politics. The school administration is focused like
a laser on the economic development of Colorado.
The state of New Mexico has only one law school. Each year it accepts only
about 100 students. Under constructive leadership, it could easily be on par
with Colorado, which ranks 43rd compared to New Mexico's 77th place on the
list of best law schools— and Colorado is moving up all the time.
Sixties-style activism and political fervor have their place, but at the UNM
Law School these are practiced at the expense of the intellectual, economic
and civic mission that a state law school is expected to fulfill.
Christina Hoff Sommers is a resident scholar at the American Enterprise
Institute in Washington, D.C. Her books include "Who Stole Feminism?" "The
War Against Boys" and "One Nation Under Therapy."
—
Related Articles
Recent Articles
Truth About Islam in Academia?
Yorktown University Beats the Odds
American History Recovered
Previous: Columbia's Censorship, Act 2