MESA Turns Down Campus Watch Ad · 17 November 2007
In a surprising act
of corporate courage, the Middle East Studies Association (MESA) has
dismissed an attempt by Philadelphia-based Campus Watch to place an ad
in the program for MESA’s upcoming annual conference in Montreal.
The text of the rejected ad read:
Campus Watch: Working to Improve Middle East Studies since 2002.
The bad news arrived in the form of a terse email from Amy W. Newhall,
Ph.D., the executive director of MESA. She wrote from her office at the
University of Arizona:
MESA's advertising policy states, ‘MESA reserves the right to
refuse ads it deems inappropriate or in conflict with MESA's
objectives.’ On this basis, we will not accept the ad from your
organization.
Sincerely,
Amy W. Newhall
MESA is the umbrella organization for practitioners of Middle East
studies (MES) in North America. Based in the Arizona desert, insiders
say it breaks through the wall of silence imposed on its members by
Campus Watch through stealth outreach efforts that include: frequent
appearances on national and international broadcast and cable news
networks and radio; articles and citations in newspapers and magazines
from around the world; countless classes involving thousands of
students on thousands of university campuses worldwide; thousands of
publications, including academic and non-academic journals and books;
and frequent public speaking gigs in every state and province and
scores of foreign countries.
The organization is known to be a fearless defender of academic
freedom, even in the face of intense internal pressure to increase its
intellectual diversity. This spirit is exemplified by former MESA
president Juan Cole of the University of Michigan, who once said, “The
FBI should investigate how [Walid] Phares, an undistinguished academic
with links to far right-wing Lebanese groups and the Likud clique,
became the ‘terrorism analyst’ at MSNBC.”
Against all odds, MESA’s Committee on Academic Freedom recently issued
a letter expressing its “grave concern” about efforts by the U.S.
Commission on Civil Rights to combat campus anti-Semitism.
That courageous act was made in light of its silence on this summer’s
now-sidelined proposal by the British faculty organization, the
University and College Union, to explore the possibility of launching a
boycott against Israeli academics.
In a further sign that MESA is willing to risk all for the sake of
principle, it has yet to condemn the successful suit brought by Mahmoud
bin Mahfouz against Cambridge University Press for publishing the
now-pulped book, Alms for Jihad.
CW’s goal in buying this ad was to raise awareness among MESA members
and thereby remove the false consciousness that has guided their work
for decades.
Given that MESA members still take Edward Said seriously, in spite of the intellectual demolition jobs visited on Orientalism
by Bernard Lewis, Martin Kramer, Robert Irwin, Ibn Warraq, and many
others, CW believed the time had come to toss an intellectual lifeline
to the group’s intellectual captives.
We were also troubled that MESA members seem to harbor a hatred of all
things American, although we don’t doubt their attachment to those
features of American life the take for granted: the rule of law, public
support of universities, loaded left-wing foundations, the First
Amendment, tenure, and a society complex and rich enough to afford a
large class of permanently-employed, over-schooled people who spend
their lives trying to undermine it.
Despite their rejection of our overture, we remain ready to come to the
aid of scholars suffering from post-colonial syndrome, post-modern
rigor mortis, censorious certitude (a tragic condition whose victims
cannot discern criticism from censorship), and other maladies of the
modern MESA mind.
Winfield Myers is director of Campus Watch.
—
Related Articles
Recent Articles
Horowitz vs. the Muslim Students Association
Eighty UCSB Professors Join National Campaign to Silence Opponents of Islamic Jihad
The "Nakba" at UC Irvine
Previous: It's 1984 at the University of Delaware
Next: Study of Bias in the Selection of Commencement Speakers at 32 Elite Colleges and Universities