Victory in Pennsylvania · 05 July 2005
By David Horowitz--FrontPageMag.com--07/06/05
Last night, the Pennsylvania House of Representatives by a vote of 108-90 passed a resolution on behalf of intellectual diversity and academic freedom for all the public universities and colleges in the state. The resolution was squarely based on the Academic Bill of Rights.
This was a tremendous victory for academic freedom not only in Pennsylvania but for states that are watching these results across the nation. Opposition to the resolution, from the teacher unions - the American Association of University Professors, the National Education Association and the American Federation of Teachers, and all their allies in local Pennslvania media - was fierce, and their defeat is that much more bitter as a result. But in the end, they had an indefensible position: opposition to the pluralism of ideas, the very heart and soul of the American social contract.
This victory would not have been possible without the political courage and steadfastness of Representative Gib Armstrong, a former Marine who was the principal sponsor and driving force behind the legislation, and Speaker of the Pennsylvania House John Perzel, an astute and savvy political leader who managed the bill's passage through turbulent legislative seas. The students of the State of Pennsylvania owe both these men a debt of thanks for their efforts.
The Pennsylvania resolution accelerates a tide that has begun to flow in the direction of academic freedom across the nation. Less than a month before the resolution's passage, the American Council on Education and 28 national groups involved in higher education, issued a statement endorsing core principles of the Academic Bill of Rights. These included the recognition that, "Intellectual diversity and academic freedom are central principles of American higher education;" and that, "Neither students nor faculty should be disadvantaged or evaluated on the basis of their political opinions." This was a reversal for the educational establishment which until then had been denying that any problem of political discrimination or hostility to intellectual diversity even existed. The Pennsylvania bill will go a long way in making sure that these noble sentiments are given practical implementation by university administrations.
The vote on HR 177 was mainly along partisan lines, although a few Democrats and a few Republicans crossed over those lines. We hope that as time passes, and tempers cool, Democrats will understand that the Academic Bill of Rights protects all students, left and right, conservative and liberal, from abuse by professors with political rather than educational agendas; that it is about the intellectual integrity of our institutions of higher learning, and that it supports the core values of an American education.
The Pennsylvania resolution sets up a Select Committee to "examine, study and inform" the legislature about the condition of academic freedom in the state's universities. This is a huge first step towards prompting university administrations to do the right thing by seeing that academic standards are enforced and that faculty do not use their classrooms for political and other agendas that have no educational justification. As Stanley Fish, himself a liberal academic, has written: "Teachers should teach their subjects. They should not teach peace or war or freedom or diversity or uniformity or nationalism or anti-nationalism or any other agenda that might properly be taught by a political leader or a talk-show host. Of course they should teach about such subjects, something very different from urging them as commitments - when they are part of the history or philosophy or literature or sociology that is being studied. The only advocacy that should go on in the classroom is the advocacy of what James Murphy has identified as the intellectual virtues, 'thoroughness, perseverance, intellectual honesty,' all components of the cardinal academic virtue of being 'conscientious in the pursuit of truth." Amen.
This is the text of the resolution passed by the Pennyslvania House, lacking one minor amendment which was made too late to be included in this report.
PRIOR PRINTER'S NO. 1280 PRINTER'S NO. 2451
________________________________________
THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA
________________________________________
HOUSE RESOLUTION
No. 177 Session of 2005
________________________________________
INTRODUCED BY ARMSTRONG, BARRAR, BENNINGHOFF, BIRMELIN, BOYD,
CALTAGIRONE, CLYMER, CRAHALLA, CREIGHTON, FAIRCHILD, FICHTER,
FORCIER, GABIG, GILLESPIE, GINGRICH, HERSHEY, JAMES,
W. KELLER, KILLION, LEH, METCALFE, R. MILLER, MUSTIO,
PALLONE, PHILLIPS, READSHAW, ROBERTS, ROHRER, SCHRODER,
STERN, R. STEVENSON, E. Z. TAYLOR, TRUE, WILT, YOUNGBLOOD,
DENLINGER, CIVERA, RAPP, FLEAGLE, FLICK, BASTIAN, BROWNE,
HARPER AND PAYNE, MARCH 29, 2005
________________________________________
AS REPORTED FROM COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION, HOUSE OF
REPRESENTATIVES, AS AMENDED, JUNE 30, 2005
________________________________________
A RESOLUTION
1 Establishing a select committee to examine the academic
2 atmosphere and the degree to which faculty have the
3 opportunity to instruct and students have the opportunity to
4 learn in an environment conducive to the pursuit of knowledge
5 and truth at State-related and State-owned colleges and
6 universities and community colleges in this Commonwealth.
7 RESOLVED, That
8
9
10
11 (lines 7-11 were struck):
12 WHEREAS, ACADEMIC FREEDOM AND INTELLECTUAL DIVERSITY ARE
13 VALUES INDISPENSABLE TO THE AMERICAN COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES;
14 AND
15 WHEREAS, FROM ITS FIRST FORMULATION IN THE GENERAL REPORT OF
16 THE COMMITTEE ON ACADEMIC FREEDOM AND TENURE OF THE AMERICAN
1 ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY PROFESSORS, THE CONCEPT OF ACADEMIC
2 FREEDOM HAS BEEN PREMISED ON THE IDEA THAT HUMAN KNOWLEDGE IS A
3 NEVER-ENDING PURSUIT OF THE TRUTH, THAT THERE IS NO HUMANLY
4 ACCESSIBLE TRUTH THAT IS NOT, IN PRINCIPLE, OPEN TO CHALLENGE,
5 AND THAT NO PARTY OR INTELLECTUAL FACTION HAS A MONOPOLY ON
6 WISDOM; AND
7 WHEREAS, ACADEMIC FREEDOM IS LIKELY TO THRIVE IN AN
8 ENVIRONMENT OF INTELLECTUAL DIVERSITY THAT PROTECTS AND FOSTERS
9 INDEPENDENCE OF THOUGHT AND SPEECH; AND
10 WHEREAS, STUDENTS AND FACULTY SHOULD BE PROTECTED FROM THE
11 IMPOSITION OF IDEOLOGICAL ORTHODOXY, AND FACULTY MEMBERS HAVE
12 THE RESPONSIBILITY TO NOT TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THEIR AUTHORITY
13 POSITION TO INTRODUCE INAPPROPRIATE OR IRRELEVANT SUBJECT MATTER
14 OUTSIDE THEIR FIELD OF STUDY; THEREFORE BE IT
15 RESOLVED, THAT A SELECT COMMITTEE COMPOSED OF THE
16 SUBCOMMITTEE ON HIGHER EDUCATION OF THE EDUCATION COMMITTEE,
17 PLUS ONE MEMBER APPOINTED BY THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF
18 REPRESENTATIVES AND ONE MEMBER APPOINTED BY THE MINORITY LEADER
19 OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, examine, study and inform the
20 House of Representatives on matters relating to the academic
21 atmosphere and the degree to which faculty have the opportunity
22 to instruct and students have the opportunity to learn in an
23 environment conducive to the pursuit of knowledge and truth and
24 the expression of independent thought at State-related and
25 State-owned colleges, universities and community colleges,
26 including, but not limited to, whether:
27 (1) faculty are hired, fired, promoted and granted
28 tenure based on their professional competence and subject
29 matter knowledge and, in the humanities, social sciences and <--
30 arts, with a view of helping students explore and understand
20050H0177R2451 - 2 -
________________________________________
1 various methodologies and perspectives;
2 (2) students have an academic environment, quality life
3 on campus and reasonable access to affordable course <--
4 materials that create an environment conducive to learning,
5 the development of critical thinking and the exploration and
6 expression of independent thought and that the students are
7 evaluated based on their subject knowledge or ability to <--
8 defend their perspective in various courses; and
9 (3) THAT STUDENTS ARE GRADED BASED ON ACADEMIC MERIT, <--
10 WITHOUT REGARD FOR IDEOLOGICAL VIEWS, AND THAT academic
11 freedom and the right to explore and express independent
12 thought is available to and practiced freely by faculty and
13 students;
14 and be it further
15 RESOLVED, That the Speaker CHAIRMAN OF THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON <--
16 HIGHER EDUCATION OF THE EDUCATION COMMITTEE of the House of
17 Representatives appoint the chairman of the committee from among <--
18 the members of the SHALL BE CHAIRMAN OF THE SELECT committee, <--
19 that committee vacancies not affect the power of the remaining
20 members to execute committee functions and that committee
21 vacancies be filled in the same manner as the original
22 appointment; and be it further
23 RESOLVED, That the committee may hold hearings, take
24 testimony and conduct investigations within this Commonwealth as
25 necessary, each committee member having the power to administer <--
26 oaths and affirmations to witnesses appearing before the
27 committee; and be it further
28 RESOLVED, That the Chief Clerk, with the Speaker's approval,
29 pay for the reasonable, appropriate and proper expenses incurred
30 by the committee; and be it further
20050H0177R2451 - 3 -
________________________________________
1 RESOLVED, That the committee make a report of its findings
2 and any recommendations for remedial legislation and other
3 appropriate action by June 30, 2006, and that the committee may
4 extend the investigation for additional time, if necessary, but
5 no later than November 30, 2006. 4 -
David Horowitz is the author of numerous books including an autobiography, Radical Son, which has been described as "the first great autobiography of his generation," and which chronicles his odyssey from radical activism to the current positions he holds. Among his other books are The Politics of Bad Faith and The Art of Political War. The Art of Political War was described by White House political strategist Karl Rove as "the perfect guide to winning on the political battlefield." Click here to read more about David
—
